More Facebook

Tom wrote a post a while back about employers demanding that employees turn over their Facebook passwords.  My opinion was that this is a very bad idea, and Tod pointed out some salient reasons why:

1. The liability issue.  In this case, will the FB combing practice increase the potential liability associated with improper hiring practices, and if so will it lead to a significantly better method of finding quality employees that will offset that risk?  And in this case, the answers are yes, and no respectively.

No one really get’s banged on really egregious stuff on the hiring end any more.  (Like, “No black people need apply!”)  Instead, they lose money based on their inability to prove a standard of constancy.  (You refused to hire this guy because he failed a drug test, but you hired this other guy who failed.)  Reviewing all that type of data on FB – posts, pics, links, what friends post and link to, etc. – is an invitation to breach of constancy.  There’s simply too much data being reviewed too subjectively.  You might not have meant to refuse to disproportionately hire a protected class of employee, but it will be far too easy to make it look like you did.  When hiring, the fewer amount of criteria used to make your decision the better.  (e.g.: “experience/knowledge, demonstrated competence and perceived value-added to the employer” is pretty good.)

This kind of weeding was really designed to guard against hiring the crazies and the potentially malicious.  It’s a poor tonic against the latter because they’ll have everything set up to see what you want to see in advance.  It might help against the crazies, but if you really need to comb someone’s FB page to do that then you need to revisit your other hiring practices.

2. The good management issue.  If you’re asked to do this for a potential employer, it’s a pretty good sign of an unhealthy corporate culture.  It certainly looks on the surface that they will be the type of employer to assume a kind of power dynamic that is more about control for control’s sake (more common than you might think), and less about a partnership based on a marriage where one side brings skills and the other capital to the table.  This makes for a crummy place to work for the employee, and on the whole creates an adverse selection system for the employer since many of the people you most want to hire won’t want to work for you.

Bad news either way you look at it.

In reference to point number 1, this drifted past my Facebook feed this morning.  It may be fictitious, but  illustrates exactly what Tod was talking about…

 

Please do be so kind as to share this post.
Share

8 thoughts on “More Facebook

  1. One thing that hasn’t been discussed as much as it should be is the privacy of people who know the person applying for the job. When I give “friends” access to my life, I am giving it to the people I choose to and not potential employers. Not just status updates, but also my phone number, email address, and so on. This is not just an issue between person and potential employer.

    This is why I take a *much* harder line on sharing passwords than I do on “You have to friend us so we can see your profile.”

      Quote  Link

    Report

  2. Before I interview, I always get the names of the people I’m going to meet.   A few Google queries, and twenty bucks apiece for a background check and I know more about them than their spouses do.

      Quote  Link

    Report

  3. The one I’m waiting to hear about is the prospect offered a job who publicly refuses the offer, based on the lack of willingness by the executive management team to hand over their Facebook passwords so the prospect might better ensure they are the kind of people worth working for.

      Quote  Link

    Report

  4. http://christopherburg.com/2011/11/16/department-of-justice-deems-violating-website-terms-of-service-illegal/

    Facebook TOS:

    3.5) You will not solicit login information or access an account belonging to someone else.

    4.8) You will not share your password, (or in the case of developers, your secret key), let anyone else access your account, or do anything else that might jeopardize the security of your account.

    I wonder how much someone would win in a lawsuit about the time they went to a job interview and were asked, or were already employed and asked by their employer, to help break the law by helping commit unauthorized computer access of a third party.

    You know, actually having ‘Employees must turn over Facebook passwords’ as a policy would seem to pierce the corporate veil, considering it’s a clear violation of the law.

      Quote  Link

    Report

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *