Presidential Debate LeagueCast

The League will have another video discussion tonight, almost immediately following the Presidential debate. For now, here’s the raw video of our chat. You’ll want to bear with us as the video starts while there’s still several minutes of the debate left. But we wound up having a very good discussion that kept moving forward nicely and I think did a good job of deconstructing (mostly) the policy planks offered by both candidates.

Certainly, the discussion was smarter than what you got on the 24-hour cable news channels, although I admit that’s not setting the bar very high.

Special thanks to guest panelist Owen and everyone who wore a tie in recognition of the formality of the debate. I, for one, will look forward to the next LeagueCast!

Nob, you’ll have to wait for the next one to escalate your futbol-inspired animosity with my favorite jersey, more offensive to you surely than A.C. Milan. This one required that I wear my stars-and-stripes tie which knotted too narrowly.

Please do be so kind as to share this post.
Share

116 thoughts on “Presidential Debate LeagueCast

  1. At some point, can we discuss how depressing it is that the intellectual level of debate at the League is much higher than the level of the actual debate? I get that this is pitched at lower-information types than the folks who hang out here, but I found that deeply depressing.

      Quote  Link

    Report

  2. Romney looks like a bad car salesman. Obama looked like he didn’t want to be there at all. Mr. Miller has this summed up: a pastiche of boring, lo-rent and oft-repeated memes. I’ve seen better rhetorical performances from high school children.

      Quote  Link

    Report

      • Good question.

        People have been noting this for the past few days.

        I’m a guy but and as Democratic as they come. Why do white guys seem to fully buy the whole stuff about rugged individualism in starbursting droves over anyone else? One of my friend’s talked about the gender gap in worldview among Colorado voters based on the little tracking things.

          Quote  Link

        Report

      • Romney had to do well and he did. The boxing scorecard definitely gave this round to Romney — but to win it, Romney had to back away from eighteen months of blustering idiocy about tax cuts. The people who Reacted Positively to Romney until this debate have much to ponder: I’m not sure the Ryan Crowd is terribly happy with Romney. This isn’t the same guy who won the GOP nomination, no he’s not.

          Quote  Link

        Report

          • Maybe you’re right, most folks won’t care. But Romney could only win by dumping all that Tax Cut Hooey. That seems lost on everyone this morning, crowing about how Romney won.

            Here’s Romney’s calculus as I see it. The Tax Cut Crowd just isn’t large enough to make a statistical difference. They’re noisy but ultimately they’re not going to be happy with anyone but Paul Ryan’s extremist crap. If Romney had stuck with them, and let’s face facts here, they will NOT like the tenor of Romney’s tax policy speechifying, Obama would have Cut him the Proverbial New One.

            There’s a difference between a bluff and a gambit. The first seven or eight intelligent moves of the game of chess have been completely mapped out and Romney’s played an incredibly aggressive opening on the campaign trail. Now he’s at the end of the midgame. He’s trying to form up for his endgame. He’s clearly down by one major piece so he has to be aggressive. He’d be stupid not to. But Romney’s bluffing and everyone knows it. Obama might seem professorial to note the math just doesn’t work, but there’s no other appropriate response.

            Romney got no bounce out of the convention. The press might be fawning now but it won’t last long.

              Quote  Link

            Report

      • Nah. Romney’s desperation is showing. He wants to win these debates because time’s running short and he’s alienated too many people already. He had too many nice things to say about ACA and Dodd-Frank and Obama cut him a New One with Romney’s lack of specificity.

        By far the toughest line of the night came from Obama: Romney’s ‘Big Bold Idea Is Never Mind’ Romney winced.

          Quote  Link

        Report

        • Romney’s desperation is showing.

          I thought so too. (Maybe I’m too partisan.) I went into this debate with a clean slate for Romney. This was a chance for him to recast himself to me as a candidate worth considering. All I saw were the gaping holes in his “plans” (which Obama effectively pointed out), his really bold lies and denials, and the appeal to pure politics and ideology when he couldn’t muster a substantive response. That stunk of desperation.

            Quote  Link

          Report

      • And Burt’s point is a good one as well. At 85% likely, Obama could only lose in this debate. And he will, most likely. He definitely played it safe, it seemed to me.

        And Romney did a much better job of explaining his positions (not his policies, I didn’t hear much about those little devils) than he has throughout the campaign. I did think his line about being bi-partisan was sorta hilarious, tho.

          Quote  Link

        Report

  3. Thoughts and questions based on the blogosphere (especially Andrew Sullivan’s meltdown) and my facebook feed.

    1. A lot of my Democratic friends (which is most of my friends) say the feel confident about the election tonight and say this non-sarcastically.

    2. Some people went into full hyperbolic meltdown just like Andrew Sullivan. How much of this psychological projecting? Why do people get paid big bucks for writing off the cuff sentences about how Obama lost tonight? Maybe he did not perform super-strongly, maybe Romney “won” the debate* but Sullivan’s full meltdown is something of a site to be seen.

    3. One day someone will need to explain the cult of Saint Ronnie to me. As someone born in 1980, I really do not understand why he is so enthralling still. He hasn’t been President for over 20 years and people still talk about him in Messianic tones including conservatives who were born after 1988. Sullivan had a whole bit about how Romney even sounded like Saint Ronnie.

      Quote  Link

    Report

  4. I thought Romney hit some high notes when he talked about conservative mythology. He lost points by saying his policies would include all the Good Stuff from Obama’s plans and None Of The Bad. When he was listening to Obama speak, he looked like he was fighting back a slippery wet-fart. On my score card, that means he lost the debate.

      Quote  Link

    Report

  5. On style and body language, I thought Romney won. He was energetic and downright aggressive. Jim Lerher essentially handed Romney his balls. What a pathetic performance on Lerher’s part.

    Romney offered so many opportunities for Obama to nail him on his lies and flip-flops, and Obama mostly passed. WTF? And he failed to defend a lot of the things he has accomplished. The folks at MSNBC are apoplectic.

      Quote  Link

    Report

    • Miss Mary, Miss Mary, Miss Mary, we need you! These guys were all smart and interesting and had smart things to say, but it was still as much a boy’s club as Sully’s photograph today.

      If there’s another postmortem after the second or third debates, would you participate? I know you’re smart from your comments, so I bet you can be clever, too.

        Quote  Link

      Report

      • Burt how do we participate? I believe I have a camera built into my laptop that I can figure out how to work (maybe) by the the next debates. Thanks for hosting it was mice to hear a thoughtful discussion. Personally I think Romney maybe came off better stylistically to some people but I did find him…umm smarmy it was his smirk and car salesman like demeanor. Well that and his shall we say creative relationship with the facts. I think Obama missed many opportunities to call him on. However it is difficult to argue or point out holes in a policy that has not been put forth in detail yet.

          Quote  Link

        Report

        • Glutton for punishment that I am, I’ve been watching debate post-mortems and the more they play clips of Mitt shutting down Jim Lerher, the more obnoxious I find it. Mitt didn’t succeed in keeping his condescension level down. It’s pretty clear he thinks he’s more important than anyone else in the room.

            Quote  Link

          Report

        • As for participating, if your laptop has a camera and microphone built in, then all you need to do is join Google+. Better if you have a gmail address but I don’t think that’s an absolute necessity.

          Hosting the thing proved a bit tricker than I thought it would. But when I was a mere participant, it was actually pretty easy to log on and the interface is just look at the computer screen for cues on the sidebar, listen to what your colleagues say, and talk when it’s your turn in the conversation. It took me a while as moderator to find the right rythym and style — this was the first time I’d served in that role — but once we hit our stride, it got moving along really nicely. And I think it was easy for the others to do their part too.

            Quote  Link

          Report

    • There seemed to be a narrow scope, but even with that they couldn’t keep their answers concise and lacked focus on the topic up for discussion. I can only imagine the chaos that could have come from addressing some of these issues, Nob. They played it safe, clearly.

        Quote  Link

      Report

    • Was it really not better to do a deeper dive on some big issues vice 2 minutes soundbite on the panoply? There’s another domestic policy debate.

      And I think brown people and women and brown people that are women do care about PPACA, social security and medicare. (more so than white men, actually) It’s Obama’s fault for providing what is perceived as only a tepid defense of his own policies (and not countering Romney’s shaky math). Though Obama did find his feet a bit on defending Obamacare about an hour in – but by then people’s perceptions were already formed.

        Quote  Link

      Report

    • Was it really not better to do a deeper dive on some big issues vice 2 minutes soundbite on the panoply? There’s still another domestic policy debate.

      And I’m pretty sure brown people and women and brown people that are women do care about PPACA, social security and medicare. (more so than white men, actually) It’s Obama’s fault for providing what is perceived as only a tepid defense of his own policies (and not countering Romney’s shaky math). Though Obama did find his feet a bit on defending Obamacare about an hour in – but by then people’s perceptions were already formed.

        Quote  Link

      Report

  6. As a nationally ranked debater who did better than anyone west of the Mississippi for my era I can state with certainty that Obama.clearly lost this debate. Sorry to all you partisans. Monday quarterbacking will not change this fact.

      Quote  Link

    Report

    • Yeah, it wasn’t nearly as bad as Leno or Conan going out on the street to debate a random pedestrian in an ambush, but that’s not saying a whole lot. The next debate should be between Romney and a random member of the studio audience who would be alert and excited and at least stands a chance of bringing up an interesting an defensible point.

        Quote  Link

      Report

    • I think Obama won on the merits, tho Romney was definitely more … energized. The problem is that media analysis is an attempt glean what the undecided stoopid purson will take away from it. That’s impossible for them to do, since they’re hi-information people. That means their opinions are irrelevant except insofar as they’re helping the low information folks make up their minds – by saying things like “Romney/Obama won the debate!” As for the debate proper, my analysis is this: if aggressiveness matters to a person, they’ll like Romney. If a coherent plan matters, they’ll vote for Obama. If they’re gonna go on ideology, then they’re not a undecided.

        Quote  Link

      Report

      • Romney seemed pretty coherent to me; Obama less so. Granted much of what Romney said seemed to contradict earlier positions, but that’s nothing new.

        In the Republican debates I watched, Romney seemed relatively ineffective except when he really needed a win. Then a different, more energized Romney showed up and eviscerated the remaining dwarves. He needed a win tonight and clearly brought his A game; whereas Obama brought his B- game.

          Quote  Link

        Report

  7. I heard the first hour or so on the radio on the way home from work. I thought Romney outpointed Obama, based on more detailed knowledge and a sounder framework for his ideas. If he’d spent that last year being this guy instead of the robotic panderer, I’d have to consider him.

      Quote  Link

    Report

  8. Wait…we were supposed to wear ties? Sorry I looked like a bum then (my wife has already chastised me). When I moderate a Leaguecast I am going to require that everyone wear camoflauge.

      Quote  Link

    Report

  9. I notice that there’s been 141 viewings of the video to date. That’s pretty amazing, if you ask me — we’re not Fox News yet but for something that had zero advance promotion and a very short shelf life, that strikes me as pretty good.

      Quote  Link

    Report

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *