Burt Likko

Pseudonymous Portlander. Homebrewer. Atheist. Recovering litigator. Recovering Republican. Recovering Catholic. Recovering divorcé. Recovering Former Editor-in-Chief of Ordinary Times. House Likko's Words: Scite Verum. Colite Iusticia. Vivere Con Gaudium.

7 Comments

  1. Burt, please go and find some actual information. IIRC, we’ve just been through increasing global temps right through an unusually low and long solar minimum (on the 11-year cycle).

  2. Sorry – I was being rude. In defense, I’ve seen this again and again and again. Denialists seize on every blip in the data to argue that global warming is over. Or a rather, every downward blip in the data.

    It seems that if the Sun did go into prolonged down cycle, that would counter a decade or less of greehouse gas growth.

  3. Right, and if you assume that the Vostok ice core data is wrong, too… well, you’d look at the temperature curves deduced from those core samples and obviously assume temperatures would be going up and to the right, right? No….

    Ah, but what the hey… we’ll see…

    and, by the way, I do have a degree in Engineering and I’m REALLY good at inferring trends from graphs… 🙂

    • “…and, by the way, I do have a degree in Engineering and I’m REALLY good at inferring trends from graphs… :)”

      I was referring to the previous denialist line, which was to use the 1998 blip as evidence that global warming was over, and that we were cooling (even well after the trend had caught up to the blip).

Comments are closed.