Note: Elliot Grant is a pseudonym, but this refers to a real case. People who follow such things may even be able to identify which one. If so, I kindly ask that you do not reference it, as that would include personal information on where I grew up, where my father worked, and so on.
My parents, as they go to bed, turn on the TV and watch Leno. It’s part of their ritual. My ritual is slightly different: I turn on the DVR and watch some non-arching crime show. Law & Order got a lot of viewing this way. Since I’ve seen so many of those, though, I’ve drifted to Cold Case, Numb3rs, Flashpoint, and other shows of the sort. One crime show that I never got into as much was Criminal Minds, though I’ll watch it when I want a sure-fire haven’t-seen-this-before episode of something. I’ve always found something about the show off-putting. Some of it relates to Elliot Grant.
One day, somebody found a dead body on a huge plot of land. They looked further, and they found more dead bodies (all women). The local PD decided that they had a serial killer and asked the FBI for a profile. The FBI sent one back. The type you would generally expect: loner, has trouble with women, possibly this, probably that. And from that point, nearly everything Grant did fit that profile. He was initially very cooperative, just as the killer would be. Then, once realizing that the police were looking at him, became very uncooperative, just as the killer would do. They found pornography on his computer, which the killer would have.
I am not entirely a fully impartial narrator. Though I don’t think I ever met Grant, he was an employee of my father’s. My father tends to be a very good judge of character, and my father found the notion that Grant was a serial killer to be absurd. And so I, too, am inclined towards disbelief. Not all that many people were. The newspapers ran his face, asking if Elliot Grant was getting away with murder. The father of one of the victims began terrorizing him, trespassing and leaving threatening phone calls (the police would tell him to stop and/or leave the property, but never prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law).
The only thing that the police lacked was proof. Any proof. They searched his house and his ranch and found not a thing (but they wouldn’t, said the profilers, because the killer would be meticulous). Eventually Grant went on television and took a lie detector test administered by a former FBI muckity-muck (the police had asked him to take one, but he had declined because he did not trust the police), which he passed on the question of whether he did it or had any knowledge of who did (he did lie about something less germane, however). This was enough for the FBI, who said that as far as they were concerned, Grant was cleared. The local PD disagreed.
For the next several years, any time a girl went missing, they would turn his ranch upside down and re-search his house. His name would be mentioned in the press again. Elliot Grant got another one. Unless they found the girl, in which case he didn’t.
About half a decade ago, for the first time in a few years, another girl went missing. Elliot Grant killed himself.
There are people that, to this day, believe that Grant was guilty. His death was only emblematic of the fact that he couldn’t live with the guilt. The detective in charge of the case conceded, who had been unmoved by Grant’s death, that Grant may have done it or may not have done it. The father that had terrorized him said the same (and that he regrets terrorizing him). To be sure, there is no proof that Grant didn’t do it. But the strength of the case against him relied partially that his land was where the bodies were found and largely on the profile.
And so… a show about profilers doesn’t excite me all that much. It’s not unlike how Law & Order SVU and Without a Trace are – to me – emblematic of our culture of paranoia surrounding sex and children and therefore less enjoyable to me.