Two-Thirds The Size of Rhode Island

It was a beautiful afternoon. That ended quickly. The sunny day became a sun we can’t see anymore. We’re nowhere near the flames, which are going up mostly on federal lands, but when you’re dealing with so many fires and three of which spanning a combined 550,000 acres (850 square miles) you don’t have to be. The wind that was annoying us earlier by rattling doors and shades was apparently enough to bring it here.

I had to take my contacts out because my eyes sting. Our noses are stuffed up. I took the dog for a walk and half an hour left me winded. Cigarettes are hardly necessary. I’m getting a headache.

Living out here, we’re immune from hurricanes. Tornadoes aren’t much of a concern. Earthquakes are a possibility but nothing of grand consequence. Even blizzards are rare. But everywhere is vulnerable for something.

I washed the cars just yesterday. I’d thought to myself “They’ve halted the work next door, apparently. It’s been a while since we’ve had a fire. The cars are all covered with… stuff.”

Murphy messed up. When you wash your car, it’s supposed to rain.

In Which I Care About Women’s Tennis

Last week, Deadspin and the Wall Street Journal reported on Taylor Townsend, the young tennis phenom that the US Tennis Association attempted to sideline on account of her weight:

But unbeknownst to everyone outside her inner circle, the USTA wasn’t happy to see Townsend in New York. Her coaches declined to pay her travel expenses to attend the Open and told her this summer that they wouldn’t finance any tournament appearances until she makes sufficient progress in one area: slimming down and getting into better shape.

“Our concern is her long-term health, number one, and her long-term development as a player,” said Patrick McEnroe, the general manager of the USTA’s player development program. “We have one goal in mind: For her to be playing in [Arthur Ashe Stadium] in the main draw and competing for major titles when it’s time. That’s how we make every decision, based on that.”

A few observations:

  1. She’s not fat.
  2. Unspoken and underlying this is something I think far more significant than all of this. Women’s tennis, in order to succeed, relies on men watching on it. Men are more likely to watch attractive women athletes than unattractive ones. The WNBA gets by, but only barely and only with the sponsorship of the NBA. If there is a fear here, I think it has less to do with Townsend’s weight (she’s not fat) and more to do with a fear that she becomes the face of women’s tennis. Serena Williams probably holds that claim now, and while she’s not Anna Kournikova, she still at least looks athletic. That Townsend looks (at first glance – she’s not fat) neither (in the conventional sense) may be problematic for the overall image of the sport.
  3. Though #2 makes me at least somewhat understanding of where the USTA may be coming from on this, it ultimately shouldn’t matter. Tennis isn’t (or shouldn’t be) the WWE where you get to pick the winners and losers.
  4. The USTA backed off of this and reimbursed the Townsend family for the expenses, seeming to want to chalk it up to some misunderstanding.
  5. Townsend ended up losing in the semifinals.

  6. In case you’re curious, Patrick McEnroe is John McEnroe’s brother.

As the title suggest, women’s tennis isn’t my sport. Nor is men’s tennis, for that matter. This jumped out at me primarily due to the weight issue and our focus on obesity. At least, in theory our concern about weight has some sort of health basis. When there is no health basis for our concern, such as when someone is winning tennis tournaments despite not looking like they should, this is something we absolutely should let go of.

It also points to what I believe is a pretty significant double standard. A number of professional baseball players don’t just look muscular, but actually look chubby. Well, more in the past (recent past included, though) than in the present. By and large, nobody cares. We’re also as likely to bond and exalt such players than lecture them (“Babe Ruth did it on hot dogs and beer”). It’s disconcerting that it matters with women. On the other hand, as someone that doesn’t care much for women’s sports, I’m not sure how much I am in a position to say anything.

Monday Trivia #75 [Mike S and James H win!]

Utah has the most or largest. After that, Colorado, Wyoming, Montana, Texas, South Dakota, Georgia, Idaho, Maryland, Washington, Virginia, Mississippi, Tennessee, South Carolina, New Mexico, Minneosota, Vermont, Connecticut, Alabama, Delaware, North Carolina, Arkansas, Alaska, North Dakota, Louisiana, Kansas, Oregon, New Hampshire, New York, Arizona, Kentucky, Oklahoma, Massachusetts, Indiana, New Jersey, Nebraska, West Virginia, Nevada, Pennsylvania, Florida, Rhode Island, Wisconsin, Maine, Missouri, Illinois, California, Ohio, Iowa, Michigan. Hawaii is the state with the least, fewest, or smallest. DC is lower still.

They’ll Need a Crane

[This post was written on Hit Coffee in 2009. I reproduce it here only because I was reminded of the whole thing this afternoon. The post-script will include an epilogue.]

Clint and I were sitting in the living room as he unloaded everything that had been going on in the past month. I was surprised and unsurprised at the same time. It was one of those things where you have to sort of re-orient yourself to a new surrounding and a new reality. Eight years earlier, I had been congratulated by a friend on my impending engagement and I had to inform him that not only was no engagement forthcoming but that Julie and I had gone our separate ways. The framework changes from one of a future to a thing of the past. Reality changes and we’re left to re-orient. When we planned this trip, I thought I was going to be helping Clint strategize his proposal. Instead, he was telling me of the destruction of everything and we were sitting there, talking and looking around an apartment that was soon to be entirely dismantled. A strange feeling to be somewhere that soon was no longer going to even exist. Continue Reading

Home Economics

One of the things I have never been good at is budgeting. I am actually good with money, but not budgeting. There’s something about knowing that I only have $x a month to spend on something that makes me want to spend all of it rather than allowing any of it to roll over. This makes me sound impulsive and irresponsible, but it’s not that. Like I said, I’m generally good with money. Generally.

When I was a kid, I had an allowance. On top of that, I delivered the local neighborhood newsletter that Mom was the editor-and-chief of. First one route, then two, then three. On top of that, I convinced Mom to give me lunch money rather than a sack lunch. I didn’t eat lunch most days and just pocketed the money. The thing is, until I discovered comic books, I never had much to actually spend my money on. So I would save it. Once it was stolen from its usual hiding place, so I started hiding it behind the comic books hanging on my wall. Only, I’d forget where it was hidden. I considered this to be an altogether good thing. Having money that was out of sight and out of mind. Getting a treat when I pulled out one of the comic books on the wall and realizing that “hey, there’s $30 behind there.”

So maybe I was impulsive. Having the money made me more likely to spend it, so I hid it from myself. A little bit later in life, sometimes I would take paychecks and set them aside. Rather than feeling the need to put them in the bank right then, I’d collect two or three of them so that I could save myself trips to the bank. I felt that it was good for me to see my dwindling bank account. It prevented me from spending. It was my own version of a rainy day fund. Except that sometimes I would forget about the checks and they would be discovered only as I was cleaning out my desk. When you’ve just been laid off, do you know how awesome it is to find two or three paychecks?

Whether I was making $7.50 an hour or some multiple of that, rare was the case where I was actually running out of money. Some of this is indicative of the privilege with which I was raised. Some of this is indicative of the way I was raised. Buying flashy things was discouraged even if it was entirely with my own money. My father gave me dirty looks for two weeks after I purchased a CD player for my car with my own money. Half the time when I bought something, I would tell them that I was borrowing it or something.

All of this made the budgeting I can’t do somewhat unnecessary. I do keep track of my accounted funds (unaccounted funds being money I have stashed away so that I don’t realize I have it) very closely. But I approach it like a score. The more points I have, the better. This, along with my raising and the dreadful anxiety I get when I feel like I don’t have enough, keeps me from buying things I want. In some cases, things I want very much and can afford. Oddly, it helps to think of it as points on a slip of paper rather than money. If I thought it was money, I’d want to spend it and I would know that I could afford that thing.

Being married has resulted in a continuation of these strategies. My wife is not very much a fan. When she was in college, she had to count every nickel and every dime. Instead, I just look at the score. I give her bi-weekly reports of how much we saved or lost on any given paycheck. I do assemble reports on where our money is going, so if we find ourselves on the losing end of the bi-weekly calculations we have a better idea of where we can cut back.

How much I spend – or feel comfortable spending – depends on how much income I am seeing. It’s not a conscious process. It’s also very inexact. Now that Clancy is pulling in 75% or so more as we were when she was a resident, we’re not spending 75% more than we did back when. But we are spending more. When she goes to a part-time schedule, we will start spending less. How much less? It’s hard to say.

Where this strategy fails is when we have no income at all. That’s where my internal accountant starts getting very disoriented. No matter how good or bad I am, the score is going down. I get discouraged and lose my bearings. It is because of this that I have become increasingly non-judgmental of those who cannot balance their books. I may disapprove of this purchase or that, but I sort of do intuitively understand what it’s like to know that you are behind, you’re going to stay behind, and if you’re screwed you might as well get that new iPod. I don’t approve, but I understand. I can’t say that I would be all that much different – especially if I had not been raised the way that I was. But beyond that, if I hadn’t had the privilege of seeing that economic actions matter. Even when I was pulling down $7.50 an hour and I had rent to pay and there wasn’t much I could do except keep my head above water, I could remember a time when it was different. I still know that these things matter, that saving helps, and so on. I have seen the reward system at work.

Anyhow, our financial roadmap looks very rocky at the moment. Due to a tax quirk, the government is now taking 43% out of our paycheck rather than the usual 38%*. Clancy will be going on maternity leave, half of which will not be paid (the other coming out of her accumulated PTO). Then there will be a return to work, likely at 3/4 pay, followed by a couple months again of no income. Followed, most likely, by an even more reduced wage while she goes back for additional training. With, of course, a kid. We’re approaching no-win territory, where we are basically managing the bleeding for the next year or so.

And I don’t do budgets well.

* – Hopefully, we’ll be getting some of that money back. The uneven income should actually bolster our return even further. If there is one advantage to all of this, we pay less taxes!

The Red West vs The Red South

In a conversation about national and regional politics, Greginak (which I know is meant to be Greg In Alaska, but I continue to internally pronounce Grejinack) awesomely makes the following delineation between the Red South and the Red West:

I can speak for red state Alaska where I live but i’ve traveled all over the West. There is much more of a libertarian streak in the rural mountain west then in the deep south. The south in general is much more religious. Its more acceptable to be pushy and overtly conservative Christian. In the rural west there is significant a “just leave me alone” feeling even if some of those people are also religiously conservative and not tolerant of any difference.

The West is far more based on natural resource use so in some ways there is an acceptance of gov action for conservation and management. Of course many feel that management should be solely focused on helping ranchers, farmers, etc be more productive.

People in the West can be easily stereotyped, just like everybody else. They are not all conservative at all. A good friend of mine from rural Nevada grew up ranching in a town of of a few hundred. She told me there a handful of male couples who lived together up in the mountains. Everybody knew they were…wink wink nudge nudge…and were fine with it.

The West has far different historical baggage then the South. The South has the confederacy and jim crow and KKK. ( yes those things were not all just the South, but that is still what they carry). The West has the treatment of Native Americans which was evil in its own right. However the West has a lot of glorious myths of westerns and cowboys they can treasure. The West in many ways is symbolic of newness, natural beauty, escape, freedom and all that is new and good as opposed to the East. But some of the things it is symbolic of is also true. The West was pristine and the place for adventure, while the East/South was old, full, built up and citified.

Many Westerners moved here within the last generation or three where many Southerners have roots going back 100-150 or more years. To a degree many in the West see the country east of the Mississippi the way Americans in general see western Europe. The eastern half of the country is the old homeland in the distant past but the West is the clean fresh home where everybody can get rich on The Big Rock Candy Mountain. Lots of people moved to the West because they thought they could get rich on gold or oil or to find room to farm or ranch that they couldn’t afford in the East/South.

Warning: egregious generalizations ahead. I hesitate to do it because both the West and the South are diverse regions, but it’s hard to have the conversation without some degree of generalization. Continue Reading

Monday Trivia #74 [Plinko Wins]

Nebraska, North Dakota, Minnesota, South Dakota, Vermont, Wyoming, New Hampshire, Iowa, Virginia, Colorado, Alaska, Kansas, Wisconsin, DC, Connecticut, Maryland, Utah, New Jersey, Illinois, Rhode Island, Texas, Washington, Idaho, Maine, Massachusetts, Nevada, Montana, Missouri, Oregon, Georgia, Ohio, Pennsylvania, California, Indiana, North Carolina, Oklahoma, Tennessee, New York, Delaware, Arkansas, Kentucky, Hawaii, Arizona, Florida, Michigan, Louisiana, Mississippi, South Carolina, New Mexico, Alabama, West Virginia.

Rethinking Auto Insurance

We bought a new Subaru Forester in late 2010. It had been a long time coming. My Ford Escort was increasingly showing its age, among other things failing to start in really cold weather. For a couple months, we had three cars. I kept the Escort parked out front and used it for relatively short trips. It was handy. It also saved gas because it got roughly 27-33 miles to the gallon instead of the Forester’s 20-25.

It was a nice arrangement and I would have kept driving it until it stopped running. I still see it being driven around town by its new owner, so approaching two years later, it’s still going.

I sold it for a very small sum. The main reason I did was that I didn’t want the expense of insurance and registration. My father-in-law is about to sell one of his cars for the same reason.

The thought occurs to me that one minor thing we might be able to do to encourage people to drive more fuel-efficient vehicles is to change the way that we do auto insurance (and maybe registration). There isn’t much good reason, in my mind, that we’re charged per-car when we have more cars than drivers. The amount of road time with two people and one car is bound to make a difference than two people and two cars, but with more cars than drivers, one car is typically going to be on the sidelines at any given time. You might have to worry about them loaning the car out, but that’s really about it.

A lot of auto insurance is guesswork. There are factors we let them use and don’t let them use, but one of the biggest (how many miles we drive) is on the honor system and almost nobody I knows is particularly honorable. Maybe my insurance company is unique, but they could police this sort of thing more than they do. For whatever reason, it isn’t that big of a priority. There are estimates of who is driving which car more frequently, but these are just estimates and that doesn’t change by focusing more on the driver than the car.

Anyhow, there are reasons why going per-driver rather than per-car would be a good idea, environmentally speaking: it would encourage people to have lighter vehicles. The main reason we went with a crossover this time around was that sometimes we need to cargo/family space. Our next vehicle may be even larger. Most of the time, we don’t need this. But when we do, it’s good to have around. There would be real advantages to having an Escort sitting out front for trips that don’t matter much. Paying the extra insurance, however, complicates that. For no really good reason.

I consider Smart cars to be neat. I don’t think I’ll ever do the motorcycle thing, but I am just as happy in a tiny little car as a big one. But I can’t do the tiny little car, really, even for short trips by myself, because I need a family vehicle, I need cargo space, and I’m not going to pay the extra insurance on the same amount of driving. If you want me to drive a small car, you ought not penalize me for also having a larger one when I need it.

Arrow (I’m Sold)

The CW has a new Green Arrow series coming out. I was planning on watching it anyway, but the trailer makes it a priority.

To add to this, they’ve apparently slated Huntress to be a guest star, which could be really good or really bad.

My only complaint is that they are apparently dropping the “Green” from Green Arrow’s name, going with just Arrow. I knew the name of the show, but was hoping it will still be the full name in the series. Maybe it will develop into that. The reason that this matters is that it is indicative of a long-standing problem with DC and their failure to cross-promote their properties. At a time when Batman movies are lighting up to top grossing films charts, the comics are (temporarily) killing off Bruce Wayne. They release a Birds of Prey series, only to give it virtually nothing in common with the comic books.

This isn’t about geek adherence. This is about the fact that they have comic books to sell and they are having a lot of trouble doing it. Advertising is usually quite expensive, but Warner Bros is particularly well positioned to remind people, for one second before every movie, that “Hey, if you like Batman, check out the comic book available at comic stores and bookstores today.” Of course, for this to work, someone has to be able to pick up the comic and not have Bruce Wayne being dead in the middle of some elongated, tortuous storyline. While it would be a mistake to reboot Green Arrow in light of the TV show, it would still be helpful if they had the same name.

Maybe they will do a better job of communicating all of this than I think. History indicates otherwise.

Chipotle Joins The Penniless Change Charge

So it turns out that some busy locations of burrito chain Chipotle* was rounding to the nearest nickel. Good for them. But apparently some people complained, so now they only round down, so people don’t complain that Chipotle “cheated” them out of a trifling amount of money. Seriously? Chipotle isn’t the cheapest burrito around to begin with, so after you’ve dropped eight dollars on a burrito and a soft drink, do you really care about the value of two pennies? I say, good for you, Chipotle. Phase out the penny!

* Burrito with cilantro-lime rice, no beans, fajita veggies, chicken, a little medium salsa, a little corn salsa, cheese, and sometimes sour cream, if you must know. I do wish, however, that a place called “Chipotle” had a salsa made with, you know, chipotles, as in smoked jalapeños and adobo.